Guruphiliac: Ashram Life Vs. Psychedelic Life



Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Ashram Life Vs. Psychedelic Life

File under: Commentary

We came upon the Sivananda Math's Yoga Magazine website after reading about its leader, Swami Niranjananand Saraswati, the heir to the throne of the Sivananda yoga empire:
In 1994, on the occasion of Shatchandi Maha Yagna to revive the Rishi parampara, his Guru finally passed on all his spiritual powers to him and declared him a Vishwa Guru.
Other than the fact that these "spiritual powers" were actually just the economic and political control of the ashram, we couldn't find much to gripe about in particular on this site. That is until we saw the whole thing as an advertisement for the ashram life. They even have college level courses to teach it to you.

Having lived at an ashram once ourselves, we've had our own taste of this life. It's mostly the attempt to stuff individuals into the guru's or leadership's interpretation of Patanjali's Yamas and Niyamas, a kind of moral code for the beginning yogi. A few people seem to be able fit into these ideals, but most fall well short... and out of the ashram life very quickly.

The main problem with ashram life is the occlusion that arises around these moral ideas and what they have to do with self-realization, which is absolutely nothing. Those who cannot conform to ashram life are seen as having little or no possible chance at self-realization, mostly because self-realization is seen as the result of a life lived within the strictures of whatever yoga is being taught at the ashram.

Commonly, those who leave may be told they can't have realization because they fucked up by leaving. Yet those who stay will likely learn to believe that they can't be realized because they haven't yet measured up to whichever idea of perfection they are worshipping at their ashram. This perfection is most often a well-defined set of very prudish ideals based on the hagiographic details of the life of the founding guru. This almost always means no sex and no partying. In other words, not much fun.

The fun is supposed to be had in the joy of maintaining your ideals, ideals which usually don't bring much more than a sense of pride and accomplishment. They sure as hell don't have anything to do with self-realization. It's like going for a gold star everyday because you've been told that getting a gold star a day will make God like you more, and if God likes you more, He may make you realized.

Take a close look around and see how many people are truly self-realized at an ashram.

We're not saying that it's not good to be good. We're saying it's bad to think that being good is going to get you realized. That you being good is the whole problem. It's gotta go, at least in its hegemonic domination of your identity. But how's it gonna go when it's so busy enjoying being good?

This brings us to the prospect of the psychedelic life. By psychedelic we mean primarily transgressive as far as yogic practices are traditionally proscribed. You can use sex, drugs, rock and roll or whatever other practices you can come up with, as long as nobody is getting hurt. We'd venture to call it tantric, but that term has been completely trashed as a label for anything other than someone's last ditch effort at a marriage rescue.

You can still be good while living the psychedelic life, you just may not be good in the terms as described by ashram life. Rather than cultivating a particular, usually rigid form of approach to one's existence, one that is often unyielding to personal idiosyncrasy, you'd be deconstructing and disintegrating any form already there and making new ones up on the fly. It's about finding out as much as you can about your self, what makes you tick, and then discarding that as soon as you've figured it out and quickly moving on.

People can find out about themselves in ashram life, too. But instead of just being allowed to be as they find themselves, they are usually jammed up into the appropriate posture as recommended by the guru or tradition. Instead of it being a natural evolution of the psyche, it's just another trip through the cookie press.

What exactly is psychedelic life? It's whatever you make it to be. It's whatever guru or teaching you happen to be interested in at the time. It's whatever experience you believe is going to bring more insight. Insight is the activated buddhi. That is where discrimination begins, not in the blind adherence to some ancient moral code. It's by learning direct and firsthand, and sustaining the cuts and scrapes that may result. This is what brings true discrimination to a life.

You are still responsible for your bills and for the lives of those around you, but you are also free to take up whichever exploratory direction feels fit, not to be decided by anyone other than yourself. It's basically about being your own guru and seeing the opportunities for growth that exist in every facet of life, not just those few at the stick-up-the-butt conventions known as ashrams.

We're sure Swami Niranjananand Saraswati knows a lot about Yoga as the tradition in India. We'd like to think his yoga university is a good place to learn about that tradition as it's been handed down for way too long now. But what the Swami seems to be failing to see is that Yoga is now conforming to life far outside the walls of any ashram. As it leaves the ashram, it leaves ashram life, and this is the best thing that could ever happen to Yoga.

Ashram life is for the very few, most of whom are too distracted by it to see the truth of their own self-realization anyway. It's time for self-realization to become established as a natural occurrence–happening within almost every facet of culture and life–not just the oppressively "spiritual." The psychedelic life can help bring this about. When people realize they can make up their own yoga, provided that sincerity is at the root of their motivation, they won't need to try to live up to the anachronistic and unrealistic ideals of ashram life in order to come to see something that is always with them, as much out of the ashram as when in it.

Speaking of ashram life, there's a few blokes in London putting together a documentary about this very thing. Film researcher Sean Kenny of the UK-based Documentary Filmmakers Group explains:
The film is at an early stage so we still have a lot of flexibility on what stories we will include. Basically, we're looking for people who have been to an Indian ashram or guru who can tell us about their experience there, good or bad. One idea we have is to film a travelogue going from ashram to ashram to see what different ones have to offer, and the sort of people they attract. So any ideas of off-beat or unusual holy men and places would be good for that. We're also looking at concentrating on a couple of people and their experiences, eg is there anyone who went to an ashram with their friend and the friend got sucked right in, destroying the friendship?
So pro or con, drop Sean a line and tell him your story. You just may save a poor soul in the process of preventing their self-realization by jacking themselves up with a bunch of superstitious Hindu nonsense... or maybe help keep them out of the reach of any hookers with cocaine to blow off their asses.

10 Comments:

At 3/08/2006 9:27 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

First off, they aren't "my" ideas. Secondly, those I know who have come to realization have done so through their own very personal and idiosyncratic means. That's all I'm saying. Everyone has their own way, and to stuff yourself into this or that guru's way is less efficacious. How many Sri Sri devotees are realized, let alone that shuckster himself? Finally, any way is going to be the mind trying to organize a way out. There is no escaping that. What I'm calling the psychedelic life isn't a way as much as an attitude, and that attitude is try whatever you feel like and see what happens, as long as you are sincere and nobody is getting hurt.

 
At 3/08/2006 9:36 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

It's about learning as much about yourself as possible. Spirituality is a psychological process, no matter how many "spirit guides" or "ascended masters" you may think you have. You've got to jump in with both hands and feet and expect to get really dirty while you are digging around in there. The prize is insight into how you operate as an individual being. At the very least this will help you in your life, regardless as to whether realization is established.

Those I know who are realized all went through some sort of big transformative process. It was different for all of them, but they all went through something. What I'm suggesting is that you jump start that process, taking the proper precautions and with responsibility for your life and that of those around you.

 
At 3/08/2006 6:14 PM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

I have no interest in dogmatic ideas, such as the idea that drugs can lead to awakening.

It's not dogmatic. It's the truth in at least one case I know about. First time LSD experience.

But I'd say it's maybe a bit less rare than coming to realization in the context of a morally conservative yoga org, although I know someone who came to know themselves there as well.

The value of drugs is in the rewiring that can occur (that's also their greatest danger.) It's about the transformation that happens. Now granted, it happens in a context of hedonism most of the time. Almost everyone is getting high to engender a pleasurable experience, with a peak experience the most sought after. The danger here is confusing the peak experience with a realization experience. Realization is anything BUT a peak experience. But us early ravers were all about chasing that peak experience and calling it spirituality on the dance floor. And it was, in the sense that we were frying out our old wiring to make room for a new wiring. I'm not quite sure it is an altogether better arrangement, but most of us seem to be getting on ok.

Neither drugs nor dogmatic beliefs are of lasting value, except to give a person a feeling of temporary expansion which the ego imagines is the Self.

The value of belief is to provide a focus for intention. They are useful as long as you are trying to get something done. Drugs can be radically tranformative in a very positive way. They also wreck lives. To each his own and buyer beware.

 
At 3/09/2006 9:26 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

Jody, I think perhaps "psychedelic" was not the best choice of word. Perhaps "tantric" should be reclaimed from the new age nitwits who have co-opted it.

You are completely correct, jf. Tantric is a much better word insofar as it describes that which transgresses. However, transgression as a practice has been completely divorced from the term tantric by the NewAge™ nitwits as well as the puritan ashramites.

The nitwits have made it all about extending orgasm and the puritans have made it about rigid adherence to guru-mediated practice, neither of which I'd call transgressive. Psychedelic is still transgressive in our culture, and so I picked that word more out of the desire to communicate the transgressive nature of the approach rather than see it confused with what all the nitwits and puritans have done with it.

 
At 3/09/2006 9:35 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

If drugs bring realization, there are millions of realized 50 somethings, me included, just waiting to tell how they "popped in". Start a crusade against ashrams and offer drug use as an alternative? Jody knows at least one person out of millions it worked for and how many whose wires are not working properly now? How many whose egoes just got a little more expanded, who think that a feeling is the same thing as a realization?

That's all a completely unfair characterization of what I said, fg.

I said that some psychedelic experience can helpful, not that drugs bring realization, despite the fact that I know of one person who came to jnana this way. I stand by my assertions that ashrams do not produce realized people, they just pop out either guilty failures or prideful puritans. Regarding ego "expansion"; it's a misnomer and one of the primary problems in yoga culture today, the idea that egos expand or contract, and especially the idea that they can be eliminated and must be.

The ahamkara must be broken, but that's not at all saying the ego must be destroyed. The ahamkara is merely the connection between the I-thought and our lives as individuals. When it is broken, we still remain individuals, only now we are individuals who know that we are not individuals.

You appear to still be under the sway of the very ideas I'm attacking with this blog. That's ok, so am I to some degree, which makes this blog as much about my own personal therapy as it is my personal Quixotic crusade against those ideas I've come to believe occlude self-realization.

 
At 3/09/2006 10:42 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

I just suggest anyone who believes he/she is enlightened, test themselves with a few years of unrelenting service, without hope of ego gratification, before they claim to be that.

And there is another occluding idea, that enlightenment will automatically render someone a servant-bot.

Service is great, as long as you are able to pay your bills. The famous Zen saying sticks everytime: Before enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood, carry water.

 
At 3/14/2006 10:38 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

My guru admitted to me that many monks drink bhang during Shivaratri. It's a little bit of fun in an otherwise strict and conservative approach.

Ramakrishna smoked ganga and kept it on hand at all times for visiting sadhus. It's quite common outside of the stick-up-their-ass puritans who infest yoga culture like herpes.

 
At 3/14/2006 10:59 AM, Blogger guruphiliac said...

At this point Jody, I suspect that your dog's ass may have been exposed to herpes.

Awwwww... Who knew you were so cute when you're trying to be snarky!

 
At 3/14/2006 2:08 PM, Blogger CHUCK said...

I must declare that there has been a distinct decline in the quality of postings since Rita came into this forum. I respectfully ask her to desist from gathering here among us. Be gone Rita and sin no more! You're upsetting my good brothers ontheotherhand and the well known dontbullme. There is nothing spiritual about your writings, Rita.

 
At 3/15/2006 5:29 PM, Blogger CHUCK said...

You sure talk a lot for a gal with only one idea, Rita. Your meter is always running!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home